Call for Papers
Open Panel: Steering Technology, Lessening Barriers and Embracing Partisanship: (Re)Constructivism and Pathways toward Alternative Modernities
Organized for 4S Meeting to be held at the Sheraton Downtown Hotel in Denver, Colorado, November 11-14, 2015
Despite all the gains made by STS in understanding how technoscience is socially constructed, inquiry into how modernity might be feasibly reconstructed to be more democratic, sustainable and/or communitarian remains woefully underdeveloped. Indeed, too often the field can be interpreted as not too dissimilar to ecology prior to the formation of conservation biology: seemingly content with cataloging failures rather than envisioning and/or aiding concrete interventions. While STS scholars have well established that contemporary technoscience could have been otherwise, the question of how it might become otherwise merits more attention (see Woodhouse 2005).
The purpose of this session is to stimulate the formation of scholastic networks to further explore how a more contemporary and future-oriented STS might generate more intelligent incremental steering toward alternative modernities. Papers could include the exploration of themes such as the pace of innovation, the appropriate application of expertise, the distribution of participation, and the conceptualization of the political. Such explorations would ideally draw from, extend or constructively critique proposed frameworks for the improved steering of technoscience. Also relevant are discussions of the tensions faced by analysts facing expectations to perform “academic disinterestedness” but still desiring to pursue explicitly partisan scholarship. How might STS researchers more productively strategize around such tensions?
This panel invites scholars from a variety of backgrounds and disciplinary traditions, utilizing a variety of methodologies, to discuss and engage with these and other themes related to the improved governance of technosocial systems. Of particular interest are case studies and analyses concerning the barriers to realizing alternative technoscience or the dismantling of status quo science and technology. Moreover, how do/can actors strategize to incrementally lessen such barriers? Finally, given the paltry progress made in intelligently steering technoscience in many societies, what reforms to STS (conceived as a sociopolitical institution) might be necessary or desirable?
Submission Deadline: March 29, 2015.
Submit paper, session, and making and doing proposals here:
Please check the box to submit your paper to open panel "Steering Technology, Lessening Barriers and Embracing Partisanship."
You can find more details about the conference on
For more information contact:
Taylor Dotson, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, email@example.com
Michael Bouchey, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, firstname.lastname@example.org
Taylor C. Dotson is an associate professor at New Mexico Tech, a Science and Technology Studies scholar, and a research consultant with WHOA. He is the author of The Divide: How Fanatical Certitude is Destroying Democracy and Technically Together: Reconstructing Community in a Networked World. Here he posts his thoughts on issues mostly tangential to his current research.
On Vaccine Mandates
Escaping the Ecomodernist Binary
No, Electing Joe Biden Didn't Save American Democracy
When Does Someone Deserve to Be Called "Doctor"?
If You Don't Want Outbreaks, Don't Have In-Person Classes
How to Stop Worrying and Live with Conspiracy Theorists
Democracy and the Nuclear Stalemate
Reopening Colleges & Universities an Unwise, Needless Gamble
Radiation Politics in a Pandemic
What Critics of Planet of the Humans Get Wrong
Why Scientific Literacy Won't End the Pandemic
Community Life in the Playborhood
Who Needs What Technology Analysis?
The Pedagogy of Control
Don't Shovel Shit
The Decline of American Community Makes Parenting Miserable
The Limits of Machine-Centered Medicine
Why Arming Teachers is a Terrible Idea
Why School Shootings are More Likely in the Networked Age
Gun Control and Our Political Talk
Semi-Autonomous Tech and Driver Impairment
Community in the Age of Limited Liability
Conservative Case for Progressive Politics
Hyperloop Likely to Be Boondoggle
Policing the Boundaries of Medicine
On the Myth of Net Neutrality
On Americans' Acquiescence to Injustice
Science, Politics, and Partisanship
Moving Beyond Science and Pseudoscience in the Facilitated Communication Debate
Privacy Threats and the Counterproductive Refuge of VPNs
Andrew Potter's Macleans Shitstorm
The (Inevitable?) Exportation of the American Way of Life
The Irony of American Political Discourse: The Denial of Politics
Why It Is Too Early for Sanders Supporters to Get Behind Hillary Clinton
Science's Legitimacy Problem
Forbes' Faith-Based Understanding of Science
There is No Anti-Scientism Movement, and It’s a Shame Too
American Pro Rugby Should Be Community-Owned
Why Not Break the Internet?
Working for Scraps
Solar Freakin' Car Culture
Mass Shooting Victims ARE on the Rise
Are These Shoes Made for Running?
Underpants Gnomes and the Technocratic Theory of Progress
Don't Drink the GMO Kool-Aid!
On Being Driven by Driverless Cars
Why America Needs the Educational Equivalent of the FDA
On Introversion, the Internet and the Importance of Small Talk
I (Still) Don't Believe in Digital Dualism
The Anatomy of a Trolley Accident
The Allure of Technological Solipsism
The Quixotic Dangers Inherent in Reading Too Much
If Science Is on Your Side, Then Who's on Mine?
The High Cost of Endless Novelty - Part II
The High Cost of Endless Novelty
Lock-up Your Wi-Fi Cards: Searching for the Good Life in a Technological Age
The Symbolic Analyst Sweatshop in the Winner-Take-All Society
On Digital Dualism: What Would Neil Postman Say?
Redirecting the Technoscience Machine
Battling my Cell Phone for the Good Life